Defendants shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.

However, each of the above punishments shall be executed for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

Defendant

A is the owner of the entertainment drinking house in the luminous-si C and the 1st underground floor, and the defendant B works as the head of the entertainment drinking house in the above entertainment drinking house and is the person who is in charge of the customer service.

On August 8, 2019, the Defendants conspired to offer alcoholic beverages to customers without any name, who visited the said entertainment drinking house, and provided entertainment services along with a female entertainment loan received through a tentatively called “news”. On the same day, the Defendants received entertainment expenses including 200,000 won from the said customers and received entertainment expenses including 200,000 won for commercial sex acts from the said customers at around 02:04 on the same day, and had them have sexual intercourse one time at the said place, from that time, with the said customers and women contact with the said customers at a e-mail.

9. Until December 22, 200, sexual traffic was arranged for business with the above method 74 times in total as shown in the annexed list of crimes.

Summary of Evidence

1. The Defendants’ respective court statements concerning Defendant A’s interrogation protocol of each police officer’s suspect interrogation protocol against Defendant B, each police officer’s protocol of statement G (name), Eel business account book (D) and investigation report (Attachment of Eel business account book) and investigation report (a copy of the sex trading place Eel business account) on the card approval contents, and application of the law of investigation report (specific of proceeds of crime)

1. Article 19 (2) 1 of the Act on the Punishment of Acts of Arranging Sexual Traffic, Etc., Article 30 of the Criminal Act, the choice of imprisonment with labor, or imprisonment with labor;

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act of the suspended execution;

1. Defendant A: The latter part of Article 25 of the Act on the Punishment of Acts of Arranging Sexual Traffic;

1. Defendant A: The grounds for sentencing under Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act recognize the Defendants’ mistake; the business period and size of revenues of this case; the degree of the Defendants’ involvement; the Defendant A did not have the same criminal record; the Defendant B had the criminal record of a fine at least once; and the Defendants’ age, character and conduct, environment, family relationship, motive and consequence of the crime.