logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 광주지방법원 2013.10.16 2013노1516
사기등
Text

All appeals by the Defendants are dismissed.

The judgment below

Criminal facts in the part of paragraph (1) of this Article are "20,64."

Reasons

1. The summary of the grounds for appeal by Defendant A, B, D, and defense counsel (unfair form of punishment) (1) is minor; (2) the period of Defendant A’s participation in the instant crime is about two months and gains acquired are insignificant; (3) there are circumstances to consider the circumstances leading to the instant crime; and (4) the period of actual participation is minor; and (3) the benefits acquired by Defendant C are minor; (4) the degree of participation in the instant crime and gains acquired by Defendant D were balanced with other Defendants; (4) the degree of participation in the instant crime and gains acquired by Defendant D were minor; and (3) the first offender was living as a normal workplace before the occurrence of the instant crime; (2) years of suspended sentence of imprisonment for six months; and (3) years of imprisonment for Defendant B; and (2) years of imprisonment for Defendant C; and (3) years of imprisonment for Defendant C and D, respectively; and (4) years of imprisonment for Defendant C and D, respectively.

2. The crime of this case committed by the Defendants in collusion with the Defendants is the so-called “Sing” crime, which is the so-called “Sing” crime, and whose damage was caused by the systematic and planned crime committed against unspecified or many victims wide and thus, the nature of the crime of the Defendants involved cannot be deemed to be less than that of the general public. The Defendant A ordered the withdrawal of the money deposited from Defendant B, C, etc. to the withdrawal of the money deposited from the “Singing” organization,” and ordered the withdrawal of the money deposited from Defendant B, C, etc., and received it, and then remitted to the account directed by the general manager of the withdrawal, Defendant B, and C, and Defendant D took charge of driving vehicles with the direction of Defendant A so that the withdrawal can move easily, thereby making it possible for the victim to commit the crime of this case.

arrow