1. The plaintiff's claim is dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

1. Details of the disposition;

A. On May 25, 2017, the Plaintiff entered the Republic of Korea with the status of stay for visa exemption (B-1) from May 25, 2017, and applied for refugee recognition to the Defendant on May 30, 2017.

B. On March 15, 2018, the Defendant rendered a decision on the refusal of refugee status on the ground that the Plaintiff’s assertion does not constitute “a sufficiently well-founded fear that would be subject to persecution” as stipulated in Article 1 of the Convention on the Status of Refugees and Article 1 of the Protocol on the Status of Refugees.

(hereinafter “instant disposition”). Specific grounds are as follows:

“The Claimant argued that he was threatened with the participation in the Syria War by the accompanying member B from the Esslive Slive Slive Slive Slive Slive Slive Slive Slive Slive Slive Slive Slive Slive Slive Slive Slive Slive Slive Slive Slive Slive Slive Slives, and that the religious leader B threatened his participation in the Slive Slive Slives of Slives of Slive Slives, etc. In other words, it is difficult to easily understand that he voluntarily returned to the Republic of Korea with the threat of participating in the Slives of Slives of Slives of Slives. The Claimant did not have an explanation of the difference between the outlines and the statements made at the time of an interview, and the Claimant’s request for refugee protection from the government of the Republic of Korea, including the fact that there was no serious and serious threat to actual gambling during his visit period.”