beta
Text
A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment with prison labor for up to six months.
Reasons
Punishment of the crime
1. Around December 20, 2012, the Defendant stated that, “Around December 20, 2016, the victim E, who is a chiller distributor in the vicinity of the D cafeteria located in Seongdong-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government, sold the chiller in the city where the chiller continues to operate the D cafeteria by selling it at retail, and then, he/she would pay the chiller price without fail. Around December 20, 2012, the Defendant made a false statement to the victim E, who is a cuber distributor of the D cafeteria.”
However, in fact, the Defendant, rather than operating a D cafeteria, lent only stores from F, the owner of the closed D cafeteria, and was supplied with the chiller by the victim without paying the price, and was not immediately able to obtain bank loans. However, the Defendant, as seen above, by deceiving the victim and being supplied the victim with the chiller equivalent to KRW 697,70 on the same day, and was supplied with the chiller equivalent to KRW 697,700 on the same day from February 19, 2013 to February 19, 2013, was supplied with the chiller in total of KRW 8,69,650 on a total amount of 19 times, as shown in the attached list of crimes.
2. On October 27, 2015, the Defendant: (a) around 19:00 on October 27, 2015, around 2015, 2015: (b) around 19:0, she franced the victim I (the age of 48), J, etc., who is a workplace commercial employee in Seongdong-gu Seoul, and took a dispute with J; (c) she heard from the victim the victim that she would be subject to death; (d) she suffered injury, such as blood transfusion, etc., from among the left-hand side in need of three weeks of medical treatment.
3. On June 8, 2010, the Defendant stated that “Around June 8, 2010, the 2016 Highest 2101 Defendant, at a “L” restaurant of the second floor of the Seongdong-gu Seoul building, “A neighbor M, who is a neighboring victim, shall be paid back immediately if he/she borrowed KRW 3 million as he/she urgently needs to pay the money for his/her business.”
However, it is true that the Defendant did not have the intent or ability to pay the money to the victim on the following day because the Defendant borrowed money from the victim and did not have any specific property.