A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for four months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for one year from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

On June 3, 2018, at around 04:38, the Defendant entered the victim C’s operation located in Seo-gu, Daegu, Seo-gu, and obstructed the business operation of the victim’s hall by force between approximately 20 minutes, including, without any justifiable reason, the Defendant: “I am going to play a funeral in this year, and then going to do so,” and “I am going to go to a few years before the beginning of this year”; I am to go to the customer; I am to go to the customer; the Defendant am to go to the end; the Defendant am to the end of the hall’s employees’ right shoulder two times with the Defendant’s shoulder, and am to the end of the hall’s operation by force over 20 minutes.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Statement to C by the police;

1. One on-site photograph;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to investigation reports (CCTV image analysis);

1. Relevant Article 314 (1) of the Criminal Act, the choice of punishment for the crime, the choice of imprisonment;

1. In full view of all the circumstances, such as the fact that the defendant in the reason for sentencing under Article 62(1) of the Criminal Act acknowledges and reflects his mistake, the defendant does not repeat again, and there is no criminal record of the same kind, damage degree, circumstances, degree of crime, degree of crime, criminal records, prosecutor’s life penalty (six months of imprisonment) is determined as ordered.