logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 부산지방법원 2018.05.09 2017나61201
구상금
Text

1. The part against the plaintiff corresponding to the money ordered to be paid under the judgment of the court of first instance shall be revoked.

The defendant.

Reasons

1. Basic facts

A. The Plaintiff is the insurer of the health insurance under the National Health Insurance Act. A is the victim who was injured due to the following accidents as the insured of the above health insurance. The Defendant is the owner of B urban bus (hereinafter “instant urban bus”) and passenger transport service provider.

On June 11, 2016, C, an employee of the Defendant, was driving the instant urban bus at around 14:43, and stopped the instant urban bus at the Newdong market located in the gravel of Busan Jung-gu, and at the location of the urban bus at issue. During that process, A, who was seated in the instant urban bus seat, was at the seat to get out of the bus and left the center, lost the face and right shoulder on the bus, and faced with approximately 6 weeks off the right shoulder, which requires treatment for about 3 weeks, thereby causing injury, such as a complete sprinking of the upper part of the columns, and the closure and cutting of the bones, which requires treatment for about 42 weeks (hereinafter referred to as “accident”).

A was treated by a medical care institution, such as Busan University Hospital, D Jong-type Medical Center, E-type Medical Center, etc. due to the instant accident. From August 11, 2016 to November 22, 2016, the Plaintiff paid KRW 5,630,70 (i.e., KRW 7,637,820 - KRW 2,07,050) - KRW 2,007,820 (Evidence 1) as medical care benefits (i.e., KRW 7,637,07,050), KRW 205, KRW 117,450 to KRW 32,40, KRW 3050, KRW 400, KRW 50, KRW 2050, KRW 306, KRW 4050, KRW 250, KRW 3050, KRW 4050, KRW 250, KRW 250, KRW 360, KRW 250, KRW 363656,

The defendant confirmed that there is no obligation against the defendant in relation to the traffic accident in this case by Busan District Court 2016da340920.The defendant filed a lawsuit for the confirmation of the existence of the obligation to the purport that it is true, A shall be the above court.

arrow