The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

1. The sentence of the lower court (a fine of three million won) on the summary of the grounds of appeal is too unreasonable.

2. Even when considering the circumstances such as the fact that the defendant does not have the previous surname, that the defendant restored the mountainous district of this case to its original state, and that the defendant separates his mistake, the crime of this case is deemed to have been occupied without permission by the competent authority, and the quality of the crime of this case is not easy, and the crime of this case is seriously detrimental to the efficient management of mountainous district and land, and the crime of this case requires strict punishment. The grounds for the defendant's assertion are deemed to have already been sufficiently considered at the original court, and all the sentencing conditions indicated in the records of this case, such as the circumstances leading to the crime, the defendant's age, character and conduct, home environment, and circumstances after the crime, etc., are considered to be unfair.

3. The defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act, since the defendant's appeal is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.

[However, in accordance with Article 25 (1) of the Rules on Criminal Procedure, it shall be corrected to add "aggravating concurrent crimes" to the end of the column of "aggravating concurrent crimes" in the application of the statutes of the original judgment.