A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.

Of the facts charged of this case, the prosecution against assault is dismissed.

Punishment of the crime

1. On October 4, 2014, at around 14:40, the Defendant interfered with business, at the entrance of the PC, the Defendant interfered with the Defendant’s management of the PC for about 15 minutes by force, such as cutting down the victim’s PC while the victim E was harming the Defendant’s assault, thereby driving away the Defendant’s PC by driving away the Defendant’s customers on the PC bank.

2. Damage to property;

A. On November 10, 2014, the Defendant: (a) around 23:30 on November 10, 2014, at the time of the Victim G (Nam, 51 years of age) located in Seocheon-gu F, Seocheon-gu, Seoul; (b) “new ferogen,” and (c) damaged the entrance door of the victim that did not open the door, thereby damaging and damaging the damaged property in the market.

B. On November 23, 2014, at around 00:25, the Defendant destroyed the market price by misunderstanding that the victim, while drunk, destroyed the Defendant’s house gate, destroying the victim’s house gate by generating the gate, and breaking the door door gate, which was put at the house at the house, and then damaging the market price due to the damage of the victim’s house gate.

Summary of Evidence

1. Partial statement of the defendant;

1. Statement of the police statement of E;

1. Each G statement;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to each field photograph, victim body photograph;

1. Relevant Articles of the Criminal Act, Article 366 of the Criminal Act, Article 314 (1) of the Criminal Act, and the choice of imprisonment for the crime;

1. From among concurrent crimes, it is inevitable to sentence the defendant to a punishment in light of the fact that the crime is committed repeatedly in a short period of time due to the reasons for sentencing under the former part of Article 37, Article 38(1)2, and Article 50 of the Criminal Act, the nature of the crime is not good, and that it does not seem that it is against the truth.

However, it is decided as per the disposition in consideration of all the circumstances, such as the fact that the defendant has led to some crimes and agreed with the victim E.