logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울행정법원 2020.11.20 2019구합81698
개별공시지가 결정처분 취소의 소
Text

The plaintiff's claim is dismissed.

Litigation costs shall be borne by the plaintiff.

Reasons

1. Details of the disposition;

A. The Plaintiff is the owner of Seocho-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government B Forest Land and 137,848 square meters (hereinafter “B”) and Seocho-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government C District 996 square meters (hereinafter “C land”).

B. On April 15, 2019, the Defendant publicly announced that the officially assessed individual land price as of January 1, 2019 is to be publicly announced as KRW 289,600, 2,273,000/m2,000/m2, each of which is to be publicly announced as of January 1, 2019.

Accordingly, the plaintiff presented his opinion to the effect that each individual land price will be adjusted upward in accordance with the equality between surrounding land and the surrounding land, taking into account the depression of the location condition of the land B and the land use condition of C.

C. On May 22, 2019, the Defendant notified the Plaintiff of the result of the treatment to raise the officially assessed individual land price to 3,157,000/m2 in consideration of the utilization status and the balance of neighboring land prices. On May 31, 2019, the Defendant publicly announced the officially assessed individual land price as of January 1, 2019 with KRW 289,600/m2, 3,157,000/m2, respectively (hereinafter “instant disposition”).

Therefore, the Plaintiff filed an objection on July 1, 2019, but the Defendant dismissed the Plaintiff’s objection on July 30, 2019 on the ground that “The result of verification by the appraisal business operator and deliberation by the Seocho-gu Committee on the Public Notice of Values of Real Estate and Real Estate Prices appropriate and balanced land price with neighboring land.”

[Reasons for Recognition] Unsatisfy, entry of Gap evidence 1 to 8 (including each number), the purport of the whole pleadings

2. Whether the disposition is lawful;

A. The Plaintiff’s instant disposition should be revoked on the ground that there is a defect in the selection of comparative standard land or the comparison of land characteristics as follows.

1) B: The Defendant’s land located far from the above land, and far far above, such as its location, size, form, access road, and current utilization, etc., Seocho-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government D land (hereinafter “D standard land”).

The comparison standard was selected as a comparative standard.

arrow