All appeals by the defendant and the prosecutor are dismissed.

1. Summary of grounds for appeal;

A. Defendant’s sentence (a year of imprisonment, 40 hours’ order to complete a sexual assault treatment program, 3 years’ restriction on employment, confiscation) is too unreasonable.

B. The Prosecutor’s sentence of the lower court is too unhued and unreasonable.

2. In the criminal litigation law that takes the trial-oriented principle and the principle of direct determination, where there exists no change in the conditions of sentencing compared to the first instance court, and the sentencing of the first instance court does not deviate from the reasonable scope of discretion, it is reasonable to respect such a case (see Supreme Court Decision 2015Do3260, Jul. 23, 2015). There is no significant change in the terms of sentencing compared to the lower court’s judgment, and the lower court’s sentencing was somewhat less or less than the reasonable scope, comprehensively taking account of all the reasons indicated in the records of the instant case.

shall not be deemed to exist.

3. In conclusion, the appeal filed by the defendant and the prosecutor is dismissed in accordance with Article 364(4) of the Criminal Procedure Act, since all of the appeal filed by the defendant and the prosecutor are without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.