1. The Plaintiff:

A. Defendant A and B: Provided, That Defendant B shall, within the scope of the property crime inherited from the network C, be 35,96, respectively.

1. Comprehensively taking account of the overall purport of the arguments in the evidence No. 1 to No. 7 as to the cause of the claim, C is the obligor of the loan No. 1, 2, 3, and 4, and Defendant A is the joint and several surety of the loan No. 4. Meanwhile, in full view of the overall purport of the arguments in the evidence No. 1, 2, and 3, C died with Defendant A and B as his heir on November 5, 2009, and Defendant B died with Defendant A and D as his heir, and D reported the renunciation of inheritance.

According to the above facts, Defendant A and B are liable to pay the Plaintiff KRW 1,05,116 and KRW 747,984 of the total amount of the 1,2, and 3 of the 1,588,074 of the total amount of the 1,588,074 of the 1,2, and 3 of the 1,96,152 of the total amount of the 1,588,074 of the 1,50,000 and the 1,495,969 of the 4,110,232 of the 4, as a joint and several surety, as a joint and several surety, to the Plaintiff. Defendant B is jointly and severally liable to pay the Plaintiff the amount of KRW 1,05,116 of the 7,984 of the above 1,00 and the 17% of the annual interest calculated from July 25, 2014 to the day of full payment.

2. It is so decided as per Disposition by the assent of all participating Justices on the ground that the plaintiff's claim is reasonable.