Defendant shall be punished by a fine of one million won.

If the defendant does not pay a fine, one hundred thousand won shall be the day.

Punishment of the crime

The Defendant served as the director in charge of managing “D Apartments” when influences.

1. Forging a private document;

A. On April 1, 2015, the Defendant entered “report on management methods” and “entrusted management methods” in the column for management method of multi-family housing in the office of the D Apartment Management Office in the Nam-si, South and North Korea, and affixed the official seal of E on the date column, stating “No. 1, 2015.”

Accordingly, for the purpose of uttering, the Defendant forged a copy of the report, such as organizing a representative meeting of occupants under the name of E, a private document related to rights and obligations.

B. On March 13, 2015, the Defendant, at the location of the above No. 1-A, intended to revise the matters to be resolved by the occupant representative meeting in order to continue to maintain the contractual relationship with the resident representative meeting, and to forge the minutes with the list of the participants of the resident representative meeting.

In accordance with the above plan, the Defendant: (a) on March 13, 2015, the agenda items for consultation on the meeting minutes of the representative meeting of the occupants of the D Apartment; (b) “1. Establishment of apartment management rules;

2. Offices of the representatives of occupants;

3. Selection of child-care center enterprises:

4. The selection of the consigned controlled entity is written in a computer doping, followed by a writing on the decision-making of the minutes “1. Establishment of management rules;

2. A case of a council room for representatives of occupants;

4. It shall be the key to the management and re-contract of a re-contract which is currently under the title of the case of entrusted management.

After the resident satisfaction survey, the author recorded 2/3 of the resident satisfaction in the book, and forged one copy of the minutes of the resident representative meeting E and 11 other members of the resident representative meeting by entering the signature column of the original copy of the minutes and copying them.

Accordingly, for the purpose of uttering, the Defendant forged a copy of the minutes in the name of E and 11, a private document related to rights and obligations.

(c)

On March 27, 2015, the Defendant “entrusted controlled entity” in the contents of the agenda for consultation on the minutes of the meeting of the representatives of occupants of D apartment units at the location of the above section 1-A.