logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 수원지방법원 2017.12.07 2017고단6705
공무집행방해
Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 2,000,000.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

The defendant is a person who has no fixed occupation.

Around 18:30 on September 20, 2017, the Defendant: (a) 18:30 on the street in front of the D convenience store located in Ssung-si; (b) frighting a fright, such as taking a convenience store along with E, taking a bath with an object, cutting off an object; and (c) frighting a horse at the front of the convenience store; and (d) frighting a fright to drink at the G convenience store located in the front of the convenience store, upon receipt of a report 112, “A fright to drink a fright to drink at the front of the F apartment G convenience store,” she interfered with the performance of the duties of the police officer, and requested the above E to present an identification card, and (c) she interfered with the performance of duties of the police officer, and interfered with the fright’s face, reporting the instant fright to the fright and body, and interfered with the performance of duties of the police officer.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Each police statement made to I and J;

1. Each statement K and L;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes governing the 112 Reporting Case Handling List;

1. Article 136 (1) of the Criminal Act concerning the facts constituting an offense;

1. Articles 40 and 50 of the Criminal Act of the Commercial Competition;

1. Selection of a fine for selective punishment (a punishment imposed on a person who has heavier penalty than that of a crime by obstructing the performance of official duties);

1. Article 70(1) and Article 69(2) of the Criminal Act to attract a workhouse;

1. The reason for sentencing under Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act was that the Defendant assaulted police officers who performed official duties in prison, thereby undermining the public power with regard to the enforcement of the law.

Nevertheless, it seems that the defendant did not sufficiently ask the police officers to use a letter.

However, the degree of assault by the defendant is serious.

It is difficult to see it.

The Defendant had no previous criminal records prior to the instant case.

The Defendant seems to have committed the instant crime under the influence of alcohol due to depression, depression, unstable disorder, etc.

arrow