1. On March 19, 2014, the decision that the Defendant rendered against the Plaintiff on March 19, 2014 was revoked.

2...

1. Details of the disposition;

A. On December 14, 1999, the deceased B (CB; hereinafter “the deceased”) entered the Army bottles, and was discharged on February 28, 2002, and was found to have been changed from the Seo-gu Daejeon Building on January 30, 2008.

B. On November 25, 2013, the Plaintiff, as the deceased, filed an application for registration with the Defendant for registration of a person of distinguished service to the State on the ground of “mental fission” (hereinafter “written application”).

C. On March 19, 2014, the Defendant rendered a decision to grant a person eligible for veteran’s compensation (hereinafter “person eligible for veteran’s compensation”) to the Plaintiff on the ground that “The record verified on the ground of the outbreak of the outbreak on the ground of the beds, which was conducted by the military hospital as a result of the observation of the pathic spirit and the pathicism, but this is not a true diagnosis name, which was hospitalized at the National Hospital in Seoul National Hospital around two months after the discharge, but it was confirmed that the disease was caused by a mental divided disease, which was not a disease diagnosed at a military hospital, but a medical certificate, etc., which was conducted after entering the military. However, it is confirmed that it was recorded based on the Plaintiff’s and his family’s statement, and it is difficult to recognize reliability and objectivity in deeming that it was generated during the performance of military duties or education and training directly related to the national defense, etc., or that there was no other concrete and objective supporting material other than the Plaintiff’s statement, on the ground that it is not recognized that there was a causal causal link or aggravated.”

[Ground of recognition] Facts without dispute, Gap 1, 2, 7 through 11 (including each number of evidence A 1, 2) and the purport of the whole pleadings

2. Whether the instant disposition is lawful

A. On December 14, 1999, the plaintiff asserted that he had shown a weak appearance at the time of conducting a military interview, but did not specifically found that he had conducted an inspection at the Armed Forces Goyang Hospital on December 21, 199.

The Deceased shall be the Navy.