1. The plaintiff's claim is dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

1. As stated in the attached Form No. 1, the Plaintiff asserts as the cause of the instant claim.

2. Product liability is the liability to impose product damage on a manufacturer, etc. in the event of a defect that has a lack of ordinarily expected safety that caused damage to the life, body, or property (Article 3(1) of the Product Liability Act). The “property damage that occurred only to the product” is excluded here (Article 3(1) of the Product Liability Act). The Plaintiff’s exercise the right to indemnity against the Defendant based on the Product Liability Act, and there is insufficient evidence to acknowledge that the insurance money paid by the Plaintiff is about the liability to impose on the manufacturer, etc. under Article 3 of

Even if the claim in this case was charged with liability for damages due to nonperformance under the Civil Act due to defects on the part of the defendant's production and supply, there is insufficient evidence to prove that there was a defect in the brue.

3. In conclusion, the plaintiff's claim of this case is dismissed as it is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.