1. On December 30, 2014, the Defendant revoked the disposition rejecting the application filed by the Plaintiff for rectification of the owner of a building.

2. The costs of lawsuit shall be.

1. Details of the disposition;

A. Regarding the Gangnam-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government C large 239.6 square meters, Plaintiff A owns 28/36 shares, and Plaintiff B owns 8/36 shares, respectively.

On October 2014, the Plaintiffs newly built Class II neighborhood living facilities of reinforced concrete structure of the first and fifth floors above the above land (hereinafter “instant building”).

B. The Plaintiffs filed an application for approval of the use of the instant building on October 8, 2014, and the written application states that the shares owned by the Plaintiffs as to the instant building are “50/100,” respectively. C. The Defendant stated that the approval for use of the instant building was granted on October 14, 2014, and that the building ledger was prepared according to the approved details, the Plaintiffs’ shares in the building ledger as to the instant building are “50/100.”

On November 11, 2014, the registration of initial ownership was made with respect to the instant building, and the registration of initial ownership was made based on the said building ledger, the Plaintiffs’ share is indicated as “1/2,” respectively, in the relevant building register. E. The Plaintiffs filed an application for approval of use of the instant building on December 23, 2014, to the Defendant on which the Plaintiffs’ share was indicated as “50/100” was indicated as the “50/100” was due to the error in the business of the architect office, and the error was found in the indication of the shares in the building register. As such, the Plaintiff’s share was 28/36, and the Plaintiff’s share was corrected to 8/36, and the Plaintiff’s share was changed to 8/36 (hereinafter “

F. On December 24, 2014, the Defendant demanded the Plaintiffs to supplement the registration certificate of the instant building as attached documents to the application pursuant to Article 19(2) of the Rules on the Entry, Management, etc. of the Building Register (hereinafter “instant Rules”).

G. On December 30, 2014, the Plaintiffs, as to the instant building registration certificate, did not coincide with the details of the Plaintiffs’ request for correction, shall implement the request for supplementation.