A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not less than one year and six months.

The seized 1,000,000 square meters (No. 22) shall be confiscated.

Punishment of the crime

On April 2, 2017, the Defendant opened a toilet screen in front of the “D church” house located in the Gyeonggi-si, Gyeonggi-do, around 15:00 on April 2, 2017. On the other hand, the Defendant: (a) opened a toilet screen in front of the company house; (b) opened the toilet screen in front of the company house; (c) continued to leak the room and inside the house; and (d) continued to follow the room and inside; and (e) took one half of the cash, 70,000 won in the Republic of Korea (Korean currency 60,000), and one half of the net money (24 km), one half of the gold bar; (d) one half of the tweet; (c) one point of the tweet; (d) one point of the tweet; (e) one point of the tweet for women; and (e) one point of the 18km for men; and (e) one point of the market price of the 18 t for men.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. A protocol concerning the suspect examination of the accused by the prosecution;

1. Statement made by the police for E;

1. A statement prepared by the F;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes on police seizure records;

1. Relevant legal provisions of the Criminal Act, Article 319(1) of the Criminal Act (influence of residence), Article 329 of the Criminal Act (influence of residence), and the choice of imprisonment with prison labor, respectively;

1. The aggravated punishment for concurrent crimes under the former part of Article 37, Article 38 (1) 2, and Article 50 of the Criminal Act (an aggravated punishment for concurrent crimes with the punishment heavier than that prescribed for larceny);

1. Reasons for sentencing under Article 48(1)1 of the Criminal Act;

1. The scope of punishment by sentence: Imprisonment for one to nine years;

2. The scope of the sentence recommended on the sentencing criteria [the scope of the recommended punishment] the basic area (one year to two years] (one year and six months) of the basic area of the theft against general property;

3. On November 20, 2016, the Defendant, who was sentenced to a suspended sentence on February 16, 2017, committed the instant crime of the same kind, even though he/she was under the suspended sentence on February 24, 2017, by having been sentenced to two years of a suspended sentence for imprisonment in the court on February 16, 2017, and the said judgment became final and conclusive on February 24, 2017, committed the instant crime of the same kind. In addition, the Defendant

However, the circumstances favorable to the defendant include the fact that the defendant has committed a crime and reflects the wrong, and that the seized damage has been partially restored and the damage has been partially restored.