Defendant shall be punished by a fine of 4.5 million won.

If the defendant does not pay the above fine, KRW 100,000.

Punishment of the crime

1. On April 30, 2015, the Defendant violated the Electronic Financial Transactions Act: (a) around 15:00, at the same time, received the amount of money in front of Dong House 107, Dong House 61-ro, Seongbuk-gu, Seongbuk-gu, Seoul, from the front side of Dong House 107, and (b) placed a deposit payment card linked to the above one bank account (Account Number: C) in the name of the Defendant using Kwikset’s service.

Accordingly, the Defendant transferred the access media under the Electronic Financial Transactions Act to another person.

2. On June 12, 2015, the Defendant promised to inform and withdraw the account number and password of the Defendant’s account holder and the Defendant’s account number and password, and to receive 10% fee on the face of the account holder under the name of the Defendant.

On June 15, 2015, at around 09:19:00, the above name omittedist misrepresented the investigator with the central prosecutor's office in Seoul, and called "the head of the Tong opened in the name of the party is being used for the crime of the Grand Tong, and the head of the passbook was discovered at the place of the financial fraud, and the head of the passbook was connected to the site of the prosecutor's office in order to confirm the contents of the case, the victim entered the number of the new bank account (F) in the name of the victim, the security card number, and the identification number of the official stamp."

After that, the above bearers, using the above-mentioned account information of the victim acquired on the same day, operated the transfer of KRW 20 million from the above-mentioned bank account of the victim to the above-mentioned one bank account of the defendant.

Accordingly, around 12:20 on June 15, 2015, the Defendant attempted to withdraw KRW 20 million from the Defendant’s bank account at the location of the original bank account in Nowon-gu, Seoul Special Metropolitan City, Nowon-gu, at the same time 1402.

Accordingly, the defendant could facilitate the above crime of the person without a name.

Summary of Evidence

1. Partial statement of the defendant;

1. A protocol concerning the interrogation of the accused by the prosecution;

1. E.