logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 인천지방법원 부천지원 2016.07.07 2016고단1140
성매매알선등행위의처벌에관한법률위반(성매매알선등)
Text

Defendant

A A shall be punished by a fine of two million won, and Defendant B shall be punished by a fine of five million won.

The above fine is imposed against the Defendants.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

Defendant

B is the owner of the "D Magaz" in Seocheon-gu, Seocheon-si C, and the defendant A is the employee of the said establishment.

1. The Defendant committed the sole crime of Defendant B, from September 25, 2015 to December 2, 2015, received 70,000 won from the customers who reported the Internet site’s advertisement and received 70,000 won from the online site’s online advertisement, and caused female employees to engage in a sexual intercourse similar to female employees, or received 100,000 won.

Accordingly, the defendant arranged sexual traffic for business purposes.

2. The Defendants’ joint crimes committed in collusion with each other from January 2016 to the same year.

3. Until December 22, 200, by the method described in paragraph 1, the commercial sex acts were arranged for business by the same way as that described in paragraph 1.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendants’ respective legal statements

1. A protocol concerning the interrogation of suspects of E;

1. Books of business places;

1. Each report, etc. on internal investigation (list 1, 14);

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes of subparagraphs 1 and 2 of this Article;

1. Relevant Acts and subordinate statutes concerning criminal facts, Defendant A who has selected a punishment: Article 19(2)1 of the Act on the Punishment, etc. of Acts of Arranging Sexual Traffic, Article 30 of the Criminal Act (in comprehensive) and Article 19(2)1 of the Act on the Punishment, etc. of Acts of Arranging Sexual Traffic, Article 19(2)1 of the same Act (in comprehensive cases, Article 30 of the Criminal Act is added to the portion of joint crimes), and a fine;

1. Article 70(1) and Article 69(2) of the Criminal Act for the attraction of a workhouse;

1. The former part of Article 25 of the Act on the Punishment of Acts of Arranging Sexual Traffic;

1. Defendant B: The latter part of Article 25 of the Act on the Punishment of Acts of Arranging Sexual Traffic;

1. The sentencing of Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act of the Criminal Procedure Act of each of the grounds for the sentencing of the Defendants (a confession, a serious reflectiveness, the first offense), unfavorable circumstances (a advertisements are placed using a high radio-wave, and sexual intercourse brokerage to customers who have found the advertisement by using a high radio wave). Other factors for sentencing as indicated in the instant case, such as the Defendants’ age, sex behavior, living environment, and circumstances after the crime, are all factors for sentencing.

arrow