Defendant

A Pronouncement of sentence shall be suspended for A.

Defendant

Of the facts charged against A, the crime of assault is committed.

Punishment of the crime

Defendant

At around 10:30 on May 23, 2015, A did not dispute with the victim B (n, 74 years of age) in front of the E office located in Nam-gu Incheon Metropolitan City, Nam-gu, and did not take part in the process of dispute with the victim B (n, 74 years of age). As a result, the part of FJ car driving car owned by the victim is 150,000 won of the repair dog, and the above office signboards owned by the victim G (72 years of age) are removed and damaged the property amounting to 300,000 won of the repair dog.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant A’s legal statement

1. A protocol concerning the police investigation of the defendant A;

1. Application of statutes on photographs, such as a reproduction machine;

1. Article 366 of the Criminal Act and Article 366 of the same Act concerning the applicable criminal facts and the choice of fines;

1. Of concurrent crimes, the former part of Article 37, Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the Criminal Act;

1. A fine not exceeding 300,000 won to be suspended;

1. Articles 70 and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the inducement of a workhouse;

1. The part concerning the rejection of prosecution under Article 59(1) of the Criminal Act (i.e., the first offense by the defendant and the original agreement with the victim)

1. Facts charged;

A. Defendant B, at around 10:30 on May 23, 2015, at the E office located in Nam-gu Incheon Metropolitan City, Defendant B, the victim A (in female, 59 years of age) engaged in the business of operating his husband G and real estate brokerage, with his husband G and real estate brokerage, and committed assaulting the victim’s head by spreading water into his head and her face with his hand at one time.

B. Defendant A, at the time, at the time, and at the place of the preceding paragraph (a) and at the same time, the victim B (n, 74 years of age) spawned water into the victim’s head and spawned water into the victim’s head and spawn.

2. The case is a crime falling under Article 260(1) of the Criminal Act, which cannot be prosecuted against the victim’s express intent under Article 260(3) of the same Act. According to the records, it can be acknowledged that the defendants, after the prosecution of this case, have consented to the withdrawal of their wish to punish one another.