A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not less than eight months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

1. On March 25, 2015, the Defendant violated the Punishment of Violences, etc. Act (Assaults, such as group, deadly weapons, etc.) obstructed the construction work at the construction site of the D building in front of the building in Bupyeong-si, Nowon-gu, Seoul Special Metropolitan City, and on the ground that the construction party removes the fences he/she constructed, the victim E (42 years old), victim F (42 years old) and G (42 years old) working at the construction site was protruding back to prevent them from entering the construction site due to protruding, making the said victims unable to enter the construction site. However, the Defendant assaulted the victims, with an electronic shock machine, which is a dangerous object that had been kept in a vehicle, and with his/her hair and clothes, and continued to use the e-mail and e-mail of the victims, and continued to use the e-mail and e-mail.

Accordingly, the defendant used an electronic shock machine, which is a dangerous object, to assault victims.

2. Although the Defendant violated the Control of Firearms, Swords, Explosives, etc. Act at the time and place specified in paragraph 1, and even if a person who obtained permission to possess an electronic shock machine is prohibited from using it without permission, unless he/she uses it for permitted purposes or there is any other justifiable reason, the Defendant used the electronic shock machine (SJG-6) to assault victims as described in paragraph 1.

Summary of Evidence

1. Each legal statement of witness E, G, H, F, and I;

1. Statement made by each prosecutor with respect to H, G, and F;

1. Statement made by the police for E;

1. The records of seizure, the list of seized articles, and the photograph of the seized articles [the defendant and his defense counsel] (the defendant and his defense counsel saw that the person involved in the construction work was slick in the process of protesting against the defective persons related to the construction work in order to remove the wall installed on the defendant's ground in a voluntary manner, and there was no electronic shock against the victims, and used the electronic shock machine for any other purpose than permitted.