1. The plaintiff's claims against the defendants are all dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

1. The plaintiff's assertion as to the cause of the claim was made around December 4, 1962 by purchasing each of the maintenance and ditch of this case from F and died on January 27, 1974 while he occupied Bori, ancient land, etc. on the ground. After the plaintiff's father G succeeded to the above Eul's possession, and died on November 15, 1996 from among the plaintiff's cultivation of cut trees and bamboo on the ground of each of the above maintenance and ditch, and died on November 15, 1996. Since the plaintiff succeeded to the above G's possession and continued cultivation on that ground, the plaintiff succeeded to the above G's possession and continued cultivation on that ground. Since the Republic of Korea's possession and possession of ditches were completed on January 27, 1994 after the lapse of 20 years from January 27, 1994, the plaintiff succeeded to the ownership of the above G, the owner of each of the above rights, the plaintiff's own ownership.

2. Determination on the claim for transfer registration of ownership as to each maintenance of this case

A. As to the Defendant’s argument that each of the maintenances of this case is administrative property, the Defendant City is each administrative property of this case, and thus, it is difficult to recognize the fact that each of the maintenances of this case is administrative property, even if considering all the evidence submitted by the Defendant City, and there is no other evidence to acknowledge it.

Therefore, the above argument of the defendant is without merit.

B. In full view of whether the Plaintiff’s possession of each of the maintenances of this case is the Plaintiff’s possession with autonomy, and the purport of the entire pleadings, it is recognized that the Plaintiff’s early December 4, 1962, acquired possession of each of the maintenances of this case from F on and around December 4, 1962 from the time of the acquisition, and from the time of the acquisition, the deceased E, G, and the Plaintiff occupied each of the above maintenances in sequence.