A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for a term of one year and two months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

The Defendant, on March 2016, 2016, proposed that “I,” at the “I,” travel agency office located in Changwon-si, Changwon-si, Changwon-si, Changwon-si, would allow the Victim D to have the Dong Europe travel between August 31, 2016 and August 9, 2016, with KRW 3,50,000 per person from July 31, 2016 to August 10, 2016.

The phrase “ makes a false statement.”

However, in fact, the defendant had aggravated financial situation at the time, appropriated the travel expenses of the relocating customer for the travel expenses of the relocated customer, and prevented him from returning the travel expenses. Since the money received from the victim D as the travel expenses was thought to be used for the travel expenses of other customers who requested the travel prior to that time, the victim D did not have an intention or ability to make up for the transportation or accommodation, etc. so that the victim D could travel in the same Europe.

The Defendant received KRW 1,50,000 from the victim D to the account (J) in the name of the Defendant for travel expenses, and acquired it by transfer from the victims through the same method until July 1, 2016, such as the statement in the list of crimes in the attached list of crimes, from the victims.

On May 12, 2016, the Defendant sent a trip to the victim K at the “I” tour office located in Changwon-si, Changwon-si, Changwon-si, a member of Changwon-si, with KRW 9.4 million for family travel expenses, from July 29, 2016 to August 1, 2016.

The phrase “ makes a false statement.”

However, in fact, the defendant had aggravated financial situation at the time, appropriated the travel expenses of the relocating customer for the travel expenses of the relocated customer, and prevented him from returning the travel expenses. However, the travel expenses received from the injured party was thought to be used as the travel expenses of another person who requested the travel prior to that time, so there was no intention or ability to send the travel to the victim.

On May 12, 2016, the Defendant, as a travel expense, from the injured party, is only 48 million won.