logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 광주지방법원 순천지원 2014.12.10 2014고단1712
폭력행위등처벌에관한법률위반(집단ㆍ흉기등폭행)
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.

except that the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

At around 16:25 on July 11, 2014, the Defendant called the bus company C, which was a bus company, for the reason that the bus started from stopping even though the Defendant wanted to get a bus at the front bus platform of the wooden apartment located in light of lightyang-si, the Defendant called the bus company C, and caused a dispute with the person in charge, and the Defendant was found at the C office located in D at the netcheon-si.

The defendant thought that the victim E (the age of 51) and F (the age of 47) who is a driver of the above bus company (the age of 51) who had been staying in the said bus office had a dispute with the person in charge of the above office at his office, are the grounds for reporting himself, and he taken the kitchen knick, which is a dangerous thing in his own inside and outside, into the left hand, and called "I am fright and fright?" while taking the kitchen kn't at his office, the defendant called the above E's shoulder at one time, called the above E's hand, moved the kn's knife to the knife, moved the above F to the knife, and made the shoulder of the above F F one time with the left drinking.

Accordingly, the defendant, carrying dangerous articles, and assaulted victims.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Application of each police protocol of statement to E and F;

1. Articles 3 (1) and 2 (1) 1 of the Punishment of Violences, etc. Act concerning facts constituting an offense, Article 260 (1) of the Criminal Act;

1. Of concurrent crimes, the former part of Article 37, Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the Criminal Act;

1. Articles 53 and 55 (1) 3 of the Criminal Act for discretionary mitigation (see, e.g., Supreme Court Decision 2009Da1448, Apr. 2, 201);

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act (Discretionary Reasons for Discretionary mitigation);

arrow