beta
Text
A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for up to seven months.
However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for a period of one year from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.
Reasons
Criminal facts
On July 19, 2017, the Defendant, in front of the C cafeteria located in Ulsandong-gu, Ulsandong-gu, Seoul around 00:28, was dissatisfied with the Defendant’s complaint that his woman living together with her husband, caused by the victim D (48 years old) who is her husband, sent a telephone to the Defendant, and then sent the victim’s complaint in the future of the said C cafeteria, and then, the Defendant was able to inform the victim of “Chewing feasia. Neasia who she was living.”
In doing so, n't have been living so, she was able to do so, she was able to see the part of the victim's left knife two times with the hand floor, she was able to blick, the victim's head knife with the floor, and then she was flicked one time with the left knife with the top of the hand knife, and then she was flife one time with a pair of dangerous things, and she was flife with the victim who was on the back of the taxi seat, and she was flife with the victim who was on the back of the taxi seat, and she was flife with the victim's head 4 times after the head knife with the second knife, and she was flick with the victim's head knife with the second knife, and she made the victim's other necessary treatment on the bridge.
Summary of Evidence
1. Statement by the defendant in court;
1. Each police statement made to D or E;
1. Police seizure records;
1. A medical certificate;
1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to victim photographs and seized articles;
1. Articles 258-2 (1) and 257 (1) of the Criminal Act concerning the facts constituting an offense;
1. Articles 53 and 55 (1) 3 of the Criminal Act to mitigate small amount;
1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act on the suspended execution;
1. The reasons for sentencing under Article 48(1)1 of the Confiscation Criminal Act include: (a) the Defendant committed several times by making use of a dangerous pair of difficulties in sentencing; and (b) the degree of damage is not less exceptionally agreed with the victim; (c) the Defendant did not have any history of punishment prior to the instant case; and (d) the details and circumstances of the instant crime.