logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 의정부지방법원 고양지원 2016.03.29 2016고단347
특정범죄가중처벌등에관한법률위반(도주차량)등
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for one year.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

On June 1, 2010, the Defendant was sentenced to a suspended sentence of one year for six months, due to a violation of road traffic law (drinking) in the Goyang Branch of the Jung-gu District Court. On April 18, 2013, the Defendant was issued a summary order of KRW 4 million with the same crime, etc. at the Incheon District Court.

1. On 22. 01. 01. 01. 22. 01. 01. 01. 01. 20, the Defendant was driving a two-way car under the influence of alcohol with approximately 0.079% of alcohol concentration in blood at the 3km section from the day before the “fluorial diameter” in the Sinsan-dong, U.S., Sinsan-dong, U.S., to the early day of the “fluorial diameter” in the early day of the “fluorial diameter” in the same Gu.

2. The defendant is a person who is engaged in driving a motor vehicle with the above low speed in violation of the Act on the Aggravated Punishment of Specific Crimes (i.e., flight vehicles) and the Road Traffic Act (ii).

The Defendant driven under the influence of alcohol at the time of the day set forth in paragraph (1) and led to the progress of a valley village after driving the distance from the cancer center on the surface of the cancer center.

In this case, a person engaged in driving of a motor vehicle has a duty of care to safely drive the motor vehicle in accordance with the signals and prevent accidents.

Nevertheless, under the influence of alcohol, the Defendant neglected to turn to the left due to negligence in violation of the signal and received the front part of the victim C(55) driving in accordance with the new sub-paragraph from the right side of the car from the victim C(55) drive, which was left to the left in accordance with the new sub-paragraph, in front of the Defendant’s car.

Ultimately, the Defendant, by such occupational negligence as above, sustained injury to the victim E (36) who was on board with the victim C by each two-day medical treatment, such as salt, tensions, etc. in need of each two-day medical treatment, and at the same time, did not immediately stop the victim’s car so that the repair cost can be equivalent to KRW 19,940,360, such as the exchange of the front pans.

arrow