beta
Text
A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not more than ten months.
However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.
Reasons
Punishment of the crime
The defendant 1344 of "2016 Highest 1344" is a person who has worked as a used car with the D Trading Complex E located in Pyeongtaek-si C.
On February 2, 2016, the Defendant made a false statement to the victim G, “The Defendant would be able to purchase a heavy garnex vehicle with a strong 6.7 million won in the middle and high garnife vehicle, and then transfer it additionally to the victim G.”
However, in fact, even if the defendant receives from the injured party the IM vehicle and the price from the injured party, he thought that the price will be consumed as a means of living expenses and debt repayment, and he did not have the intent or ability to deliver the IF vehicle to the injured party.
Ultimately, the Defendant, by deceiving the victim as above, received 10,000 won from the victim, immediately from the victim, and received 6,70,000 won from the account in the name of the Defendant on February 27, 2016.
"2016 Highest 2365"
1. Embezzlement;
A. On January 14, 2016, the Defendant, at the office of the “E Trading Company” located in Pyeongtaek-si, received KRW 11 million from the victim L, the representative director of the E company, “The purchase price for the Ncopi-type sports vehicle owned by M in the name of the trading company and transfer it in the name of the trading company” and received KRW 10 million from the victim.
While the Defendant kept the purchase money for the victim, he arbitrarily used 4 million won for the purpose of living expenses, etc., and embezzled the victim’s property.
B. On February 22, 2016, the Defendant received KRW 5,500,000 from the injured party L from the “E Trading Company” office, stating that “The Defendant purchased 5,500,000 won a low-priced OM vehicle in the name of the trading company and transferred it in the name of the trading company.”
While the Defendant kept the purchase money for the victim, he embezzled the victim’s property by using the entire use of living expenses, etc. around that time.
2. Fraud;
(a) Victims P.