The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

The summary of the grounds for appeal did not restrain the instant crime.

Nevertheless, the lower court recognized the instant crime on the basis of the following: (a) the victim without credibility and F’s statement; (b) the pictures capable of fabrication; and (c) the text dialogue between the Defendant and F

Judgment

In light of the following, comprehensively taking account of the evidence duly examined by the court below, including the statements of the victim and F, the facts constituting the crime in the judgment below can be fully recognized.

Defendant’s assertion is without merit.

In the statement of Australia police, the statement submitted to the police of the Republic of Korea (referring to the police of the Republic of Korea), the second police statement, the prosecutor's statement, and the court below's statement consistently and specifically stated the crime of this case in lieu of the statement of the police of the Republic of Korea.

Although the victim is somewhat confused about the order of occurrence of the case, it is merely a minor disagreement due to the limit of memory.

A witness of some of the crimes in this case makes a consistent statement in lieu of the Australian Police Statements and e-mail protocol, and generally conforms to the statements of the victim.

Although there is a little difference between the victim's statement and the victim's statement in detail, it can be seen that F arising from witnessing the crime of this case or minor, including the limit of memory, because F is broken on the new wall.

The details of the defendant and the F Characteration are supported by the above statements of the victim and F.

The photograph, such as damaged articles, damaged parts, knife, and bags, shall also support the victim and F's above statements.

The defendant asserts that only some of the damaged goods exist a photograph, and there is no photograph of other high-priced goods, so the victim would face with F and horses and manipulate the above photograph.

However, the victims have consistently specified the damaged goods from the Australian police to the original trial.