The prosecution of this case is dismissed.

1. The summary of the facts charged was that the Defendant, who is engaged in driving BM520 vehicles, was driving the said vehicle as a job around 08:40 on February 4, 2013, led to the rapid and non-speed of the vehicle at the fixed parking lot for the Y520 vehicles, which is located in the Y520 vehicle.

In such a case, the defendant engaged in driving service has a duty of care to accurately operate the steering gear and brakes, to properly see the post-facel, and to take the post-facel in such a way as not to interfere with other vehicles.

Nevertheless, the Defendant’s negligence in the course of the business, which was negligent in neglecting the back of the backway, led to shocking the part of the Defendant’s vehicle behind the driver’s seat of the victim CEX driving, which was stopped by reporting the Defendant’s vehicle.

Ultimately, the Defendant, through occupational negligence above, caused the victim to suffer injury to satitiss and tensions that require approximately two weeks of medical treatment, and at the same time damaged the victim’s vehicle to cover KRW 160,298 of repair cost.

2. The facts charged in the instant case are crimes falling under Article 3(1) of the Act on Special Cases concerning the Settlement of Traffic Accidents, Article 268 of the Criminal Act, and Article 151 of the Road Traffic Act, and cannot be prosecuted against the victim’s express intent pursuant to the main sentence of Article 3(2) of the Act on Special Cases concerning the Settlement of Traffic Accidents. According to the records of the instant case, it can be acknowledged that the victim submitted to this court a document that the victim would not want punishment against the defendant on August 14, 2013, after the institution of the instant case, since the facts charged in the instant case are recognized, the prosecution of the instant case