1. All appeals filed by the plaintiffs are dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal are assessed against the Plaintiffs.

The purport of the claim and appeal is the purport of the appeal.

1. The reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance concerning the instant case is as follows: (a) the statement of evidence Nos. 7 through 13, which is insufficient to acknowledge the plaintiffs' assertion as additional evidence submitted by the court of first instance; and (b) the result of the credit information reply to T Institutions by the court of first instance is rejected; and (c) the following judgment is supplemented by the grounds of the judgment of the court of first instance.

2. According to the statement No. 16 and 17 evidence No. 16 and the purport of this court's fact-finding reply and the whole arguments with respect to the Seoul Central District Tax Office and the Seoul Central Health Insurance Corporation branch, the asset ratio compared to the asset ratio of the instant management body for the year 2018 fell below the previous year. The debt and the payable debt of the instant management body for the year 2018 fall below the amount corresponding to the year 2017. The amount of the instant management body's 4th premiums for the National Health Insurance Corporation from January 2019 to September 2019. The instant management body increased the parking lot profit in the amount of KRW 343,84,590 in the amount of the parking lot income of KRW 343,84,590 in the year 2018 (the amount of KRW 164,230,000 in the year 20), and the fact that the management body cannot be seen as being actually paid by the management body of this case.

3. Accordingly, the judgment of the first instance is justifiable, and all appeals by the plaintiffs are dismissed. It is so decided as per Disposition.