The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

1. Summary of grounds for appeal;

A. In relation to the obstruction of performance of official duties by mistake of facts, the defendant only runs towards F by the police officer F, and there was no physical contact at all, and there was no fact that the defendant used the elbow and shoulder part of F by using the elbow and shoulder as stated in the facts charged.

B. Regarding the point of assault and bodily injury at the I point of mental and physical disorder, the Defendant was unable or weak to discern things under the influence of alcohol or make decisions.

C. The lower court’s sentence of unreasonable sentencing (two years of imprisonment) is too unreasonable.

2. Determination

A. The lower court found the Defendant guilty of obstruction of the execution of official duties of the Defendant with the following facts: (a) according to the evidence of this case, such as witness F, K, L’s statutory statement, F, K’s statement, police statement, L’s statement and cell phone photographing CD image, etc.: (b) the Defendant appears to have expressed that the police officer called the Defendant had been sentenced to imprisonment for a long time; and (c) the Defendant continued to engage in severe humiliations while speaking that “the Defendant was arrested due to the crime of insult”; (d) the victim F, who is a police officer, was able to keep his well harming himself; and (e) approach the victim F, who is a police officer, to the direction of convenience; and (e) “B” was called as “B, I am this,” and said, “I am this,” and the victim was aware of the charge of assaulting the victim’s name and dubow price part of the Defendant’s act of assaulting the victim, and the victim was found guilty of obstruction of the performance of official duties of the Defendant’s.