The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

1. The main point of the grounds for appeal is that the sentence imposed by the court below on the defendant (one year of suspended sentence in six months of imprisonment without prison labor) is too unreasonable.

2. In a case where there is no change in the conditions of sentencing compared with the first instance court, and the sentencing of the first instance court does not deviate from the reasonable scope of discretion, it is reasonable to respect it.

(See Supreme Court en banc Decision 2015Do3260 Decided July 23, 2015). In addition, there is no change in circumstances that may consider the sentencing following the lower judgment. The instant accident is inappropriate even if the Defendant asserts that he/she was a reason for appeal in light of various sentencing conditions indicated in the instant records and arguments, such as: (a) the Defendant was at fault; (b) the victim E was at fault; (c) the victim E was in need of approximately 14 weeks of medical treatment; (d) the Defendant was committed the same offense in 2016 and 2018, but was subject to a disposition that is irrelevant to the right to institute prosecution; and (b) the Defendant was sentenced to a suspended sentence of imprisonment for committing an offense in 2018; and (c) the Defendant was able to have been sentenced to a suspended sentence of imprisonment for committing an offense in 2018.

3. If so, the defendant's appeal is without merit, and it is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act. It is so decided as per Disposition.