1. The plaintiff's appeal is dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

Purport of claim and appeal

The first instance court.

1. The reasons for the court's explanation concerning this case are as follows, and the following judgments are added to the matters alleged in the court of first instance, and the court's rejection of Gap evidence No. 6, which is insufficient to recognize the plaintiff's assertion as additional evidence submitted in the court of first instance, is the same as the part of the reasons for the judgment of the court of first instance, and thus, it is acceptable in accordance with the main sentence of Article 420 of the

2. The Plaintiff asserts that even if he did not obtain a delegation from the Defendant to sign and seal the joint and several liability column of the material lease contract (Evidence A No. 3), the Defendant is obligated to pay the Plaintiff the unpaid rent of KRW 7,127,192 and the delay damages therefrom in accordance with the legal doctrine of expression representation under Articles 125 and 126 of the Civil Act.

On the other hand, there is no evidence to acknowledge that there was a basic right of representation for the defendant against B (Article 125 of the Civil Act) to the plaintiff (Article 126 of the Civil Act) and that there was a basic right of representation for the defendant (Article 126 of the Civil Act). The plaintiff's above assertion is without merit without further review.

3. According to the conclusion, the judgment of the first instance is legitimate, and the plaintiff's appeal is dismissed as it is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.