beta
Text
1. The plaintiff's appeal is dismissed.
2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Plaintiff.
The purport of the claim and appeal is the purport of the appeal.
Reasons
1. Facts of recognition;
A. On August 4, 2014, the Plaintiff was examined at the C police station investigation and the Cyber Team office on the charge of suspected crimes, such as violation of the Act on Promotion of Information and Communications Network Utilization and Information Protection, Etc. (Defamation). 2) At that time, the Defendant was a police officer who was in office as the C police station cyber investigation team leader, and was in charge of investigating the Plaintiff, and prepared the interrogation protocol thereof.
B. On September 25, 2014, the Defendant filed a summary order with the Incheon District Public Prosecutor’s Office on the following grounds: (a) on September 25, 2014, the Defendant: (b) on the part of the Defendant filed a motion for summary order with the Plaintiff on the facts of the offense, such as violation of the Act on Promotion of Information and Communications Network Utilization and Communications Network Utilization and Information Protection, etc. (Defamation) with the purport that “E, the chairperson of the Dong-gu Incheon Public Prosecutor’s Office, is deemed to have an inappropriate relationship with F, who is the chairperson of the Dong-gu Incheon Public Prosecutor’s Association; (c) the Plaintiff repeatedly arrived at the e, which arouses fear or apprehension by means of G message; and (d) by inserting false writing on the bulletin board for the electronic civil petition counter of Dong-gu Incheon Metropolitan City Office and the H bulletin board of the D Dong-dong Council, thereby impairing the honor of E; (d) on February 6, 2015, the Prosecutor of the Incheon District Public Prosecutor’s Office filed a summary order with the Plaintiff on February 16, 2015.
3. On July 23, 2015, the above court found the Plaintiff not guilty of the fact that the Plaintiff repeatedly delivered the codes and phrases causing fears or apprehensions to E, and the fact that the Plaintiff’s honor is damaged by inserting false letters on the bulletin board of the Ddong-gu Incheon Metropolitan City Electronic Civil Petition Book.
As to this, the plaintiff appealed and appealed, but on the other hand, on 2016.