logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울행정법원 2016.08.26 2016구단12953
난민불인정결정취소
Text

1. The plaintiff's claim is dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

Reasons

1. Details of the disposition;

A. On June 13, 2014, the Plaintiff filed an application for refugee status with the Defendant on July 8, 2014, prior to the expiration date of the period of stay ( July 13, 2014), when having entered the Republic of ASEAN (C-3) and stayed in the Republic of Korea on a short-term visit (C-3) sojourn on a short-term basis.

B. On October 15, 2015, the Defendant rendered a decision on the recognition of refugee status (hereinafter “instant disposition”) on the ground that the Plaintiff does not constitute a case of “a well-founded fear that would be detrimental to persecution” as prescribed by Article 1 of the Convention on the Status of Refugees and Article 1 of the Protocol Relating to the Status of Refugees.

[Reasons for Recognition] Unsatisfy, Gap evidence Nos. 1, 2, Eul evidence Nos. 1, 2 and 4, the purport of the whole pleadings

2. Whether the instant disposition is lawful

A. The Plaintiff’s assertion: (a) had graduated from high school in 1982 to 2009; (b) had been engaged in the middle/high-class sales business while living in the bend village in the bend village; (c) but thereafter had been residing in the bend village from 2010 to 2012; and (d) had left for most hours from 2012 to 2014 at the bend home of the Ora-gun’s Pro-gu branch in the Ora-gun-gu branch in 2012 to 2014.

The plaintiff's land as the plaintiff's land was a member of Boco Slock B, which was living in the Slive Village, and around May 2008, the plaintiff threatened the plaintiff that he would know the plaintiff's name in Bocon if he forced the plaintiff to join Bocon Slock. However, the plaintiff refused the plaintiff's land and caused damage.

B, even after the Plaintiff’s workplace and the Plaintiff, forced the Plaintiff to join the workplace, and failed to join the Boco Ba, and if the Plaintiff did not join the Boco Ba, Boco Ba would be the Plaintiff’s death.

At the time of the plaintiff's leaving a fright village and staying in a frighting village, B's intimidation continued when the plaintiff returned to a fright village.

However, in February 2014, the plaintiff is in a pawn village around 2014.

arrow