logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 대구지방법원 2019.06.13 2018나314422
제3자이의
Text

1. The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Defendant.

Purport of claim and appeal

1..

Reasons

1. The reasoning for the court’s explanation as to this case is as follows, and the Defendants’ assertion emphasized or added by this court is as stated in the reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance, except for the additional determination under paragraph (2) below, and thus, it is acceptable to accept it as it is in accordance with the main sentence of Article 420 of the Civil Procedure Act.

The second part of the judgment of the first instance court is “one square meter of H forest” as “112 square meters of H forest and one thousand square meters of U forest”.

The second sentence of the first instance court's decision " June 29, 1963" is referred to as " August 29, 1963".

The second part of the judgment of the court of first instance is that “each of the above divided real estate is divided in sequence from May 7, 2007 in order from around May 7, 2007,” which read “the above divided real estate shall be converted into the area, the change of land category, and the division.”

The second written judgment of the court of the first instance states " October 18, 201" as " October 28, 201 or October 18, 2012" in the second written judgment of the court of the first instance.

The third written judgment of the court of first instance is referred to as the " December 26, 2012" in the first written judgment as " October 26, 2012."

The following shall be added to the 11th sentence of the first instance court:

(D) A witness of the first instance trial and witness V testified to the effect that “It is reasonable for the Plaintiff to donate each of the real estate listed in the attached Tables 1 and 2 to the Defendant, because N, the father of the Plaintiff, arbitrarily disposed of the housing owned by N, the father of the Plaintiff, in the past.” However, each of the above testimony was made by O on the grounds that the transfer registration of each of the instant real estate was completed by O, or is merely merely on his position or judgment).

2. Additional determination

A. As long as the plaintiff alleged by the defendant, delivered documents and seals necessary for the procedures for ownership transfer registration, including a certificate of personal seal impression, to the certified judicial scrivener office, and delegated all the authority as to each real estate listed in the separate sheet 1 and 2 to theO, the contract, which is a disposal document that the plaintiff donates each real estate listed in the separate sheet 1 and 2, to

arrow