logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 수원지방법원 평택지원 2015.10.22 2015고정469
사기등
Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 900,000.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

The defendant shall be the chairman of the council of occupants' representatives in Ansan-si.

1. The Defendant in fraud: (a) around July 14, 2014, to D head of the C Apartment Management Office around the same year from June 27, 2014.

7. Until November, 197, meals were provided in the process of a conference with the representative for the development of the C apartment, and the president used his/her own vehicle for the business of the president, and thus, the president submitted receipts such as credit card sales slips using KRW 33,100 in total over 15 times, including KRW 26,000 in E, KRW 10 in “F”, KRW 10,000 in “G”, and KRW 160,00 in “G”.

However, the defendant did not have any meals while holding a meeting with the representative or used his own vehicle for the chairperson's duties.

As above, the Defendant deceiving the head of the apartment management office D and transferred KRW 333,100 as the operating expenses of the council of occupants' representatives on July 25, 2014.

In addition, the defendant from that time to that year.

8. Until December 25, 200, a total of KRW 1,096,50 ( KRW 333,100, KRW 204,000) was remitted by the said method three times.

Accordingly, the defendant was given money by deceiving the victim.

2. Around September 1, 2014, the Defendant changed his private document: (a) written the content that “The payment of welfare expenses in the bill 2. is approved on behalf of the occupant representative meeting in the name of the occupant representative meeting prepared on August 8, 2014,” with the intention of using it for paying night-time meals to the employees engaged in night-time service in the management office office in Ansan-si, the content that “The payment of welfare expenses in the bill 2. is approved on behalf of the employee representative meeting prepared on August 8, 2014.”

In order to exercise, the defendant changed one copy of the representative meeting of the tenant, which is a private document under the name of the apartment council of occupants.

3. The Defendant is aware of occupational breach of trust from around December 2013 to November 13, 2014.

arrow