(영문) 서울남부지방법원 2016.04.20 2015고단791

beta

본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.

Text

Reasons

텍스트 조절

글꼴

크기(pt)

굵기

줄 간격

자간(%)

(영문) 서울남부지방법원 2016.04.20 2015고단791

폭력행위등처벌에관한법률위반(집단ㆍ흉기등상해)

Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not less than eight months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

The defendant is a person who resides in the Gangseo-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government 101 Dong 403, and the victim D (34) is a person who resides in the same 503 Dong.

The Defendant paid 60,000 won to the victim's house glass for the reason that the victim living on the upper floor caused noise between the upper floor. However, the Defendant was willing to inflict injury on the victim who received a demand to further compensate for the damages because there have been a large amount of repairing expenses from the victim.

On February 21, 2015, at around 12:00, the Defendant, at the front corridor of the Defendant’s house No. 101, 403 of the above apartment building No. 101, caused the victim to have the victim paid damages, and then, at the top of the dangerous object in possession ( approximately approximately 21cm, approximately 9cm in length on the day of the household), the victim was at the top of one time, which is a dangerous object in advance, and caused the victim to suffer injuries such as the treatment of the number of days when the head, shoulder, etc. was rapidly taken by the dried-gu string.

Summary of Evidence

1. Partial statement of the defendant;

1. Statement made by the police against D;

1. A victim image photograph;

1. The Defendant and his defense counsel asserted that the Defendant’s response to the order to submit documents (the Defendant and his defense counsel stated the time when the Defendant was the victim by the dried string, but the Defendant did not have the fact of leaving the victim’s dried string.

However, the victim was at the investigative agency that the defendant was at the same head with his own head and was at the time of head and shoulder with the same monll.

was stated.

In the E hospital emergency medical records, the victim found for treatment on the day of the instant case, stating that the victim was flicker in the E hospital emergency medical records, and that the victim was flicker, and that the victim was flicker, and that the victim's injury was flicker's flicker's flicker's flicker's flicker's flicker's flicker's flicker's flicker's flicker's flicker's f

유사 판례

-창원지방법원 2012.11.09 2012고단2273

-서울동부지방법원 2014.06.18 2014고단1106

-제주지방법원 2019.05.29 2018고단1819

-수원지방법원 2020.05.27 2020고단826

-대구지방법원 서부지원 2018.08.21 2017고단1523