logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 대전지방법원 천안지원 2014.05.29 2013고단612
위증
Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 3,000,000.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

On March 18, 2013, the Defendant appeared as a witness of the Daejeon District Court Branch Branch of the Daejeon District Court Decision 2012Ma718, and took an oath upon being notified of the right to refuse to testify. The facts are as follows: (a) C was found in the E pharmacy located in the Dong-gu, dong-gu, Dong-gu, Chungcheongnam-gu, where C was at night around April 25, 2012 in order to hear and comply with the statement that C would contain an examination of the Defendant; and (b) C was able to unilaterally make a false statement about C’s face one time with his hand and one time at the seat of C at around 21:56 on the same day; (c) the prosecutor’s “(E at night on April 25, 2012)’s statement that C would be tight witness,” and (d) he did not unilaterally make a false statement about C’s face, “I will not see it.”

Summary of Evidence

1. Partial statement of the protocol concerning the examination of the accused by the prosecution;

1. Statement made to A by the prosecution;

1. A copy of each protocol of examination of a witness to G, H, F, and A;

1. A copy of the fifth trial records, and a copy of the sixth trial records; and

1. A copy of each protocol of examination of a judicial police officer prepared G, each protocol of examination of a suspect against C, each protocol of examination of the same H, C, and F;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to a copy of a investigation report (CCTV data analysis);

1. Article 152 (1) of the Criminal Act and the choice of fines concerning the crime;

1. Articles 70 and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. Judgment on the defense counsel’s assertion under Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act

1. The summary of the argument is that the defendant was prosecuted for the injury of both parties with C, and he was tried as co-defendant with C, and he did not assault himself.

arrow