Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 3,000,000.

If the defendant does not pay the above fine, 50,000 won.

Punishment of the crime

The defendant is a person who is engaged in driving a C-learning car.

On June 28, 2012, the Defendant driven the above vehicle at around 17:49, and proceeded to the Han field library at the Han field, Han field apartment, and the Han field library at the middle of Daejeon.

Since the location is the U.S. prohibited zone, a person engaged in driving of a motor vehicle has a duty of care to avoid a U.S. internship due to the central line.

Nevertheless, the Defendant: (a) got the front part of the victim D(39 years of age) driving E car driven by the Defendant’s driver’s vehicle in the front part of the victim D(39 years of age) driving while driving the center line; and (b) due to the shock, the Defendant’s driver’s vehicle was in India while driving the vehicle, and was in India. (c) 55 years of age.

Ultimately, the Defendant caused the victim D’s injury, such as light fluoral salt, which requires treatment for about 2 weeks, due to the above occupational negligence, and the victim F suffered injury, such as a high-speed fluoral electric fluoral, which requires treatment for about 14 weeks.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Each statement of D and G;

1. Report on traffic accident (report on actual condition of traffic accident 1, 2);

1. An accident-related photograph;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes of each written diagnosis;

1. Article 3 (1) of the relevant Act on Special Cases concerning the Settlement of Traffic Accidents, and Article 268 of the Criminal Act concerning criminal facts;

1. Articles 40 and 50 of the Criminal Act of the Commercial Concurrent Crimes (Punishment on the violation of the Act on Special Cases concerning the Settlement of Traffic Accidents against Victims F with heavy judgment);

1. Selection of an alternative fine for punishment;

1. Articles 70 and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. The reason for sentencing under Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act of the provisional payment order is to be very large to the defendant's negligence committed the central line and the degree of damage caused by such negligence. However, on the other hand, the victim F's severe damage appears to have caused the victim's failure to perform his duty of care before the victim D, and both victims and victims.