1. The Defendant’s determination of a disability grade No. 8 subparag. 7 that the Plaintiff rendered on October 8, 2018 shall be revoked.

2. The costs of lawsuit shall be.

1. Details of the disposition;

A. On November 6, 2010, while working in B, the Plaintiff was dissatised during the wheelchairs replacement work, and was first given medical treatment until May 4, 2013, with the following as an approved injury: “Insatis, the lower part of the lower part of the left part, the lower part of the lower part of the lower part of the company, the lower part of the lower part of the left part of the company, the lower part of the left part of the company, the anti-satis, the left part of the port, the lower part of the company, the lower part of the company, the lower part of the company, the lower part of the company, the lower part of the company, and the left part of the company.”

B. On May 6, 2013, the Plaintiff filed a claim for disability benefits, and on May 15, 2013, the Plaintiff was paid the disability pension by the Defendant upon receiving the determination of the disability grade No. 7 applicable mutatis mutandis to the left-hand scare disability falling under class No. 8 subparag. 7 and the left-hand knee-related disability falling under class No. 12 subparag. 10.

C. On May 18, 2015, the Plaintiff filed an application for re-determination of a disability grade on the left-hand bridge. On May 20, 2015, as a result of the special examination by C Hospital on May 20, 2015, the restriction on the exercise of the left-hand knee part does not reach the disability grade, and at least 1/2 of the ordinary exercise scope is determined to be limited, and the Defendant changed the Plaintiff’s disability grade to Grade 10 No. 14 on June 10, 2015.

In response to this, the Plaintiff filed a lawsuit seeking revocation of the above disability grade change (Seoul District Court 2015Gudan21166, Busan District Court 2015) but withdrawn the lawsuit, and thereafter, again filed a lawsuit to the same effect (Seoul District Court 2016Gudan1190, hereinafter “transfer lawsuit”), but was dismissed as the time limit for filing the lawsuit.

The Plaintiff re-medical care was provided from December 14, 2016 to November 20, 2017, where “satisfyed satisfys on the left side satisfys” was re-medical care.

E. On September 10, 2018, the Plaintiff again claimed disability benefits to the Defendant.

The defendant's disability grade 8 October 8, 2018 is based on the fact that the left-hand knee is not deteriorated, and that the advisory doctor measured the scope of the plaintiff's left-hand hnee hnee hnee hnee hnee hne