logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 수원지방법원 2014.02.21 2013고단48
사기
Text

Defendants are innocent and each of them dismissed an application for compensation order filed by an applicant for compensation.

Reasons

1. Defendant A is a person who has been engaged in gambling sales business three times and has been engaged in clothes sales business, Defendant D is a person who has served as an original offender, Defendant B is punished one time, Defendant B is punished for gambling, Defendant B is punished two times, Defendant C is punished for fraud, and Defendant C is a person who operates coffee shop four times of punishment for gambling, and two times of punishment for fraud.

Defendant

The Defendants of the criminal acts A, D, and B decided to obtain money from the victim K with a studio to be able to obtain money from the victim K with a studio with a studio, which is the same as the victim on the ground that Defendant B, who had a studioless studio with a studio much degree of 5 points compared to the victim, who had a studio studio studio studio studio studio studio studio studio studio studio studio studio studio studio studio studio studio studio studio studio studio, and Defendant D had a leading role, such as displaying the place to be studio studio studio studio, and distributing the profits from the studio studio studio studio studio studio.

Around September 19, 2007, Defendant A used water to 403 LA, which was colored and leased by Defendant A, and Defendant D had access to the above location and enticed the victim who was aware of the bio-diversity of the anti-diversity of the anti-diversity of the anti-diversity of the anti-diversity of the anti-diversity of the anti-diversity of the anti-diversity of the anti-diversity of the anti-diversity of the anti-diversity of the anti-diversity of the anti-diversity of the anti-diversity of the anti-diversity of the life.

arrow