1. The part of the judgment of the court of first instance against the plaintiff (Counterclaim defendant) regarding the counterclaim shall be revoked, and the above revoked part shall be applicable.

A principal lawsuit and a counterclaim shall be deemed simultaneously.

1. Basic facts

A. On May 23, 2012, the Defendant entered into a contract between the Defendant and the Gu Gun Gun 1 (hereinafter “D”) with the Jeonnam-gun on May 23, 2012, and 43.5 (hereinafter “D”).

(2) On June 5, 2012, 201, 74,070, 350, and the due date for completion of the project, the amount of KRW 74,070 and KRW 27,000,000,000,000,000,000 and KRW 12,00,000,00,00

On July 31, 2012, the term of completion was determined as 74,587,040 won, and the contract was entered into with the Defendant to enter into a contract for each set of timber, sprinking, sprinkling, sprinkling, and collecting products. 2) The Defendant’s contracted services are divided into: (i) the lower part of the tree, (ii) the act of cutting the bottom of the tree with the electric saw, (iii) the act of cutting the trees into a certain length and cutting the trees into a certain length, (iv) the act of piling the trees to secure space after cutting the trees, and (iv) the work of collecting the products to move the trees to another place.

B. The Defendant entered into a subcontract agreement with the Plaintiff and paid part of the purchase price) around June 2012, the Defendant introduced the Plaintiff from the Defendant’s G G H and made an oral offer between the Plaintiff and the Plaintiff, and the Defendant was awarded a contract under each contract (hereinafter “instant work”).

3,000,000 won (hereinafter referred to as the “instant agreement”) are agreed to subcontract to the Plaintiff.

(2) The Defendant paid each of the above KRW 20,000,000 to the Plaintiff on June 25, 2012, including KRW 10,000,000, and KRW 20,000,000 on August 8, 2012.

C. On June 14, 2012, the Plaintiff, upon the Defendant’s consent, agreed to perform the instant work with I along with I, divided the I and the area into the I and carried out the instant work. On July 1, 2012, the Plaintiff completed the instant work, and thereafter, completed the instant work, and thereafter there is a further request for the addition of the former Gun during the supervision.