logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울서부지방법원 2015.06.24 2015고단715
폭력행위등처벌에관한법률위반(집단ㆍ흉기등상해)
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not less than one year and six months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment became final and conclusive.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

The Defendant began to offer a school system from around July 2014 with the victim C (n, 43 years of age) and around July 2014, but from around September 2014, the Hague was requested by the victim.

At around 14:00 on March 23, 2015, the defendant was waiting for the victim before his house while the victim was waiting for the victim as he refused to do so. At around 22:30 on the same day, the defendant discovered the victim from his house at around 2:30 on the same day and entered his house together with the victim.

In addition, the Defendant took a bath at that place to the victim by stating, “I do not want to speak. I do not want to do so. Ma. b. b. Do, I see it as garbage. I see it as a garbage,” and brued the victim’s neck in her hand, and she took a knife (30 cm in total length, 18 cm in knife length) with a knife (18 cm in knife) which is a dangerous object in the kitchen, which was in the kitchen, and she took the victim’s hand, and she took the victim’s neck again by assaulting the victim’s head at the left hand, and assaulting the victim at the time of his head.”

As a result, the defendant carried dangerous objects and carried a scarcity and scarcity with which the number of days of treatment cannot be known to the victim.

Summary of Evidence

1. Partial statement of the defendant;

1. C’s legal statement;

1. Some of the statements made by the prosecution against the accused in the examination protocol of suspect;

1. Statement of the police statement regarding C;

1. Photographs of the victim's body and photograph of the criminal tool;

1. The application of the law of seizure [the defendant and his defense counsel's assertion is not accepted since the defendant and his defense counsel acknowledged that they used a lethal weapon and used it as a weapon, but argued that the injury suffered by the victim was caused before carrying a lethal weapon and argued that the injury was caused by carrying a lethal weapon. However, according to the evidence duly adopted and investigated by the court, the crime of this

1. The act of violence as provided for in the corresponding Article of the Criminal Act;

arrow