logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울남부지방법원 2016.11.25 2014가합3369
구상금
Text

1. The Plaintiff:

A. Defendant A is calculated by 213,841,00 won and 15% per annum from September 14, 2016 to the date of complete payment.

Reasons

1. Facts of recognition;

A. On July 15, 1989, the Plaintiff is a legal entity established with the objective of providing disabled education, institutional improvement, welfare facilities, and support for the operation of self-supporting workplace on July 15, 1989. The Plaintiff is a rehabilitation center established by Seoul Special Metropolitan City B pursuant to Article 34 of Social Welfare Services Act and Article 27 of the Workers’ Vocational Skills Development Act (hereinafter “instant rehabilitation center”).

(2) Around August 2001, Defendant A was entrusted with the operation of the instant rehabilitation center. (2) around August 2001, Defendant A was employed as a vocational training teacher of the instant rehabilitation center from the head of the branch office affiliated with the Plaintiff, and performed the tasks of the branch office and the instant rehabilitation center. From February 1, 2008 to October 2013, Defendant A performed the tasks of employing workers and employees of the instant rehabilitation center, raising and operating funds, and promoting various profit-making projects.

B. On December 3, 2010, Defendant A’s occupational embezzlement: (a) transferred KRW 2.3 million from D, who is the customer of the rehabilitation center of this case to the account in the name of the bank in which he/she uses it for personal use; and (b) transferred the proceeds of the rehabilitation center of this case to the account in the name of the bank in which he/she uses it for personal use; (c) transferred the proceeds of the rehabilitation center of this case through Internet banking on the same day to the account of the designated bank; (d) left the balance of KRW 300,000 to the above Suhyup account as it is; and (e) embezzled the remaining 30,000 won by discretionary consumption of mobile phone charges around that time; and (e) from May 13, 2013 to May 13, 2013, Defendant A was sentenced to a suspended sentence of 237,346,528 won (hereinafter “the instant embezzlement”) and embezzled the proceeds for personal use, such as the settlement of personal credit cards, and payment of charges, and sentenced to the above 20151.

(c) Conclusion of an insurance contract for fidelity guarantee;

arrow