logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 전주지방법원 2018.12.20 2018구합71
견책처분취소
Text

1. The plaintiff's claim is dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

Reasons

1. Details of the disposition;

A. From January 27, 2016 to July 6, 2017, the Plaintiff served in the former Regional Police Agency B police station female juvenile and female juvenile circles, and currently served in the C police station.

B. On August 11, 2017, the Defendant issued a reprimand (hereinafter “instant disposition”) pursuant to Article 78(1)1, 2, and 3 of the State Public Officials Act on the ground that the Plaintiff committed any of the following acts and violated Articles 56, 57, and 63 of the State Public Officials Act.

1. On June 3, 2017, it concluded that D’s phrase “D head of D team and E’s term “I” was written against D’s commercial mitigation D’s order (hereinafter “the reason for Disposition 1”), on the ground that D’s application for sick leave due to injury during the campaign on May 30, 2017, the mitigated D said D’s term “D head of D’s team” was written on several occasions on the ground that D’s application for sick leave due to injury.

2. It shall be limited to working hours, such as Einsan (one time) and the diameter of each reservoir (2 times) using official vehicles during working hours of delivery, such as mountain, etc. (hereinafter referred to as "grounds for disposition 2"), while on duty;

3. From January 2017 to April 2017, a false claim for the instant investigation expenses (hereinafter “grounds for Disposition 3”) was filed by the company for personal meal expenses (3 cases, 106,000 won) as the investigation expenses of the case.

C. The Plaintiff, who is dissatisfied with the instant disposition, filed a petition review, but was dismissed.

[Ground of recognition] Facts without dispute, Gap evidence No. 22, Eul evidence No. 9 to 11, the purport of the whole pleadings

2. Whether the instant disposition is lawful

A. The plaintiff's assertion 1) The plaintiff's assertion that "I am I am I am I am I am I am I am I am I am I am I am I am I am I am I am I am I am I am I am I am I am I am I am I am I

(b) On the grounds for the second disposition.

arrow