1. The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Defendant.

Purport of claim and appeal

1...

1. The basic facts;

2. The reasoning for this Court’s explanation concerning this part is as stated in the corresponding part of the judgment of the court of first instance, except for the alteration of part of the grounds for the judgment of the court of first instance as follows. Thus, this part is accepted by the main text of Article 420 of the Civil Procedure Act.

4 pages 4 changed "D, a representative director of the defendant's company, as the representative director of the defendant's representative, to "D" -4 pages below - 5,6 of the 5,006 line "it is reasonable to deem that the defendant worked as the defendant's inside director until July 8, 2014." The following facts or circumstances are as follows: (i) He is the defendant's spouse who was in office as the defendant's representative director; (ii) H is the defendant's representative director; (iii) F is a 100,00 shares of G company; (iv) F is a 100% witness's shares of G company (Evidence 1, 27, 28; witness testimony of the court of first instance); and (v) it is difficult to directly verify the departure from office of the defendant's 25,000 line after his departure from office in light of the following facts: (v) it appears that the plaintiff's additional 1,000 shares of G company were less than 3.

“The above recognition is insufficient to be followed only by the descriptions of the evidence of sub-paragraphs 1 through 3, and Eul 9 through 16 (including paper numbers), and there is no counter-proof otherwise.

According to the statements in Gap evidence 1 and Eul evidence 9 and testimony in witness F in the six pages - 1 through 3, G is a shareholder who owns 500,000 shares of the defendant, and F is a shareholder who owns 100,000 shares of corporation G, and F is a shareholder who owns 50,000 shares of the defendant's shares, and F is a shareholder who owns 10,000 shares of corporation G.