logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 수원지방법원 2013.08.13 2013고합373
살인미수등
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for five years.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

On September 3, 2009, the Defendant was sentenced to imprisonment with prison labor for two years and six months for attempted special robbery at the Gwangju High Court on September 3, 2009, and completed the execution of the said punishment on November 14, 201.

1. Around 201, the Defendant, who attempted to murder, came to know of the victim C (the 32 years of age) through a scam, an Internet site, and exchanged the victim’s communication. However, on October 2012, the Defendant agreed to teach the victim from the mid-201 police officers. However, the victim showed the Defendant’s attitude of not informing the Defendant of drinking alcohol and his occupation, such as taking the victim’s contact with the Defendant. From October 20, 2012, the Defendant and the Defendant attempted to talk on several occasions only with the Defendant from around several occasions.

The defendant found the victim's residence in Yeongdeungpo-gu D several times, and demanded the window to be sleeped, and continued to refuse it, and tried to kill the victim by breaking the victim.

Around 19:00 on October 23, 2012, the Defendant: (a) returned to the victim’s residence at around 19:00; (b) opened the front door; (c) opened the front door to the victim; (d) opened the victim’s seat only once; and (e) placed the victim’s timber on the part of his hand without delay; and (d) tried to kill the victim by taking the victim’s timber on the part of the victim’s hand by hand; (c) opened the victim’s seat on the part of the victim; and (d) opened the victim’s seat on the part of the victim; and (d) taken the victim’s timber on the part of the victim’s hand; and (e) attempted to murder the victim by taking the victim’s humf as his hand; (e) by misunderstanding the victim’s death, the Defendant did not commit any attempted humfing the victim’s humf.

2. The Defendant, while misunderstanding the victim as to his death at the above date and place, escaped from the victim’s home page, thief was stolen by taking away one cellular phone with the market value of 800,000 won owned by the victim and the key of the victim’s residence.

Summary of Evidence

1..

arrow