logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 특허법원 2018.09.13 2017허6040
등록취소(상)
Text

1. The plaintiff's claim is dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

Reasons

1. Basic facts

(a) Date of application 1)/registration number: Designated service business on November 19, 208: 3): Home service business, personal security service, personal career assistance business, personal career assistance business, building and facility security business, building security services, marriage consultation business, marriage information provision business, marriage security service business, alarm and lease business, security counsel business, security service business, public event security service business, airport security service business, passenger and cargo security control business, airport fire protection service business, international marriage brokerage business, heavy cargo tracking business, stolen vehicle tracking business, lock-out business, lock-out business, lock-out business, personal security surveillance service business, building and facility security service business, online fire, fire-fighting and alarm service business, safety information service business, safe guard service business, passenger and cargo delivery business, airport security service business, airport safety brokerage business, private vehicle tracking business, entertainment business, hospital and security guard business, etc., quarantine and surveillance service business, notice business, online fire-fighting and safeguard information service business, recreation and safeguard information service business, recreation of abandoned houses, safe information service business, funeral service business, funeral service business;

B. On December 28, 2015, the Plaintiff had not used the instant registered service mark against the Defendant as the Intellectual Property Tribunal No. 2015Da5730 on December 28, 2015, for three or more consecutive years prior to the date of filing a request for revocation without justifiable grounds.

In addition, the holder of the registered service mark of this case intentionally.

arrow