A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date of the final judgment.

Punishment of the crime

피고인은 2014. 8. 1. 00:15경 경산시 B에 있는 'C' 앞길에서, 소란을 피우는 사람이 있다는 위 영상제작실 업주의 신고를 받고 출동한 경산경찰서 D파출소 소속 경사 E, 경사 F이 피고인에게 '무슨 일 때문에 그러냐 '고 묻자 '야 개새끼들아 죽인다, 너거들 노래방 하고 다 짜고 그따위로 하지 마라, 경찰관 새끼 죽여 버린다‘라고 욕을 하고, 먼저 ’파출소로 가자‘고 말하여 순찰차 뒷문을 열어주자 순찰차에 탑승하는 척하다가 갑자기 뒤돌아서며 경사 F의 목 울대 부분을 양손으로 때리고 오른손 둘째손가락을 잡아 비틀고, 이를 제지하던 경사 E에게 ‘씹새끼야 죽을래’라고 하며 양손으로 가슴을 1회 치고, 오른손 엄지손가락을 잡아 비틀고 발로 왼쪽 다리 발목 위 부분을 1회 걷어찼다.

As a result, the defendant interfered with the legitimate execution of duties concerning the handling of reported cases by AssistantF and Assistant E, who is a police officer, and at the same time, the victim E (the age of 51) did not keep the left-hand side in need of treatment for about two weeks.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Each police statement of E and F;

1. Medical certificates (E);

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to photographs of the upper part of the body;

1. Article 136 (1) of the Criminal Act and Article 257 (1) of the Criminal Act concerning the facts constituting an offense;

1. Articles 40 and 50 of the Criminal Act of the Commercial Concurrent Crimes;

1. Selection of imprisonment with prison labor chosen;

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act;

1. The reason for sentencing under Article 62-2 of the Social Service Order Act is the motive and circumstance of the crime in this case, method of the crime, and the reflect social nature of the crime in this case that interfered with the legitimate execution of duties by police officers, etc. However, the nature of the crime in this case is not weak, but the defendant's mistake is divided and reflected, the degree of injury is relatively minor, and the defendant has no same criminal record and criminal records beyond the suspension of execution.